{"id":2366,"date":"2026-08-13T15:00:00","date_gmt":"2026-08-13T07:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/cnbygele.com\/?p=2366"},"modified":"2026-08-13T15:00:00","modified_gmt":"2026-08-13T07:00:00","slug":"apf-svg-before-after-comparison-method","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cnbygele.com\/ar\/blog\/apf-svg-before-after-comparison-method\/","title":{"rendered":"\u0637\u0631\u064a\u0642\u0629 \u0645\u0642\u0627\u0631\u0646\u0629 \u0645\u0627 \u0642\u0628\u0644 \u0648\u0628\u0639\u062f \u0644\u0645\u0634\u0627\u0631\u064a\u0639 APF \u0648 SVG"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"b2b-article\">\n<p style=\"margin:0 0 16px;line-height:1.7\">A before-and-after APF or SVG comparison is only as useful as its comparison basis. The pre and post records should answer the same question at the same electrical boundary, using known meter settings and comparable operating conditions. Otherwise, a difference in the data may only describe a difference in the plant state.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:0 0 16px;line-height:1.7\">For broader planning context, start with the <a href=\"https:\/\/cnbygele.com\/ar\/power-quality-system-guides\/\">power quality system guides<\/a>. This method organizes a controlled comparison; it does not promise a fixed improvement, compliance result, energy saving, or operating outcome.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"margin:26px 0;text-align:center\"><img decoding=\"async\" style=\"max-width:640px;width:100%;height:auto;display:block;margin:0 auto;border-radius:8px\" src=\"https:\/\/cnbygele.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/24.JKG2B.webp\" alt=\"CNBYG controller for documenting an APF or SVG before-and-after comparison\" \/><\/figure>\n<nav class=\"b2b-toc\" style=\"background:#f5f8fa;padding:16px 20px;border-radius:8px;margin:0 0 24px\">\n<h2 id=\"contents\" style=\"margin:42px 0 14px;scroll-margin-top:96px\">\u0645\u062d\u062a\u0648\u064a\u0627\u062a<\/h2>\n<ul style=\"margin:0 0 18px 1.2em;line-height:1.7\">\n<li style=\"margin:0 0 8px\"><a href=\"#part-1-define-the-comparison-question-before-commissioning\">Part 1. Define the comparison question before commissioning<\/a><\/li>\n<li style=\"margin:0 0 8px\"><a href=\"#part-2-hold-the-electrical-boundary-and-setup-constant\">Part 2. Hold the electrical boundary and setup constant<\/a><\/li>\n<li style=\"margin:0 0 8px\"><a href=\"#part-3-match-operating-conditions-before-comparing-records\">Part 3. Match operating conditions before comparing records<\/a><\/li>\n<li style=\"margin:0 0 8px\"><a href=\"#part-4-preserve-evidence-and-disclose-changes\">Part 4. Preserve evidence and disclose changes<\/a><\/li>\n<li style=\"margin:0 0 8px\"><a href=\"#part-5-separate-comparison-data-from-a-performance-promise\">Part 5. Separate comparison data from a performance promise<\/a><\/li>\n<li style=\"margin:0 0 8px\"><a href=\"#part-6-create-a-project-comparison-package\">Part 6. Create a project comparison package<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/nav>\n<h2 style=\"margin:42px 0 14px;scroll-margin-top:96px\" id=\"direct-answer\">\u0625\u062c\u0627\u0628\u0629 \u0645\u0628\u0627\u0634\u0631\u0629<\/h2>\n<p style=\"margin:0 0 16px;line-height:1.7\">Define the comparison question first, then match or disclose the electrical boundary, meter configuration, time basis, and operating state. Preserve original records from both periods and agree how the project will interpret the comparison before drawing conclusions.<\/p>\n<h2 style=\"margin:42px 0 14px;scroll-margin-top:96px\" id=\"part-1-define-the-comparison-question-before-commissioning\">Part 1. Define the comparison question before commissioning<\/h2>\n<p style=\"margin:0 0 16px;line-height:1.7\">State the question that the comparison is intended to answer. It might concern a defined harmonic-current record, reactive-power behavior at a selected feeder, or a documented operating condition. The wording should identify the boundary and evidence type, not a generic promise to make the plant better.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:0 0 16px;line-height:1.7\">Assign a review owner and an acceptance method before the post-installation data is collected. This helps the project team decide which records are comparable and which changes need to be disclosed.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:0 0 16px;line-height:1.7\"><strong>\u0645\u0647\u0645<\/strong> Do not claim a project outcome from a post-installation display alone. The project boundary, operating conditions, and acceptance method must be defined before a comparison can be interpreted (<a href=\"https:\/\/standards.ieee.org\/ieee\/519\/5892\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">\u0646\u0638\u0631\u0629 \u0639\u0627\u0645\u0629 \u0639\u0644\u0649 IEEE 519<\/a>).<\/p>\n<table style=\"width:100%;border-collapse:collapse\">\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th style=\"border:1px solid #d9e1e8;padding:9px 12px;background:#f5f8fa;text-align:left\">Comparison purpose<\/th>\n<th style=\"border:1px solid #d9e1e8;padding:9px 12px;background:#f5f8fa;text-align:left\">Define before data collection<\/th>\n<th style=\"border:1px solid #d9e1e8;padding:9px 12px;background:#f5f8fa;text-align:left\">\u0623\u062f\u0644\u0629 \u0644\u0644\u0627\u062d\u062a\u0641\u0627\u0638 \u0628\u0647\u0627<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #d9e1e8;padding:9px 12px\">\u0645\u0631\u0627\u062c\u0639\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u062a\u064a\u0627\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u062a\u0648\u0627\u0641\u0642\u064a<\/td>\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #d9e1e8;padding:9px 12px\">Selected feeder, measurement point, and record type<\/td>\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #d9e1e8;padding:9px 12px\">Pre\/post exports and instrument settings<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #d9e1e8;padding:9px 12px\">Reactive-power review<\/td>\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #d9e1e8;padding:9px 12px\">Electrical objective and operating scenario<\/td>\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #d9e1e8;padding:9px 12px\">Meter fields, load state, and switching state<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #d9e1e8;padding:9px 12px\">Commissioning verification<\/td>\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #d9e1e8;padding:9px 12px\">Review owner and acceptance method<\/td>\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #d9e1e8;padding:9px 12px\">Installation record and controlled comparison set<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<h2 style=\"margin:42px 0 14px;scroll-margin-top:96px\" id=\"part-2-hold-the-electrical-boundary-and-setup-constant\">Part 2. Hold the electrical boundary and setup constant<\/h2>\n<p style=\"margin:0 0 16px;line-height:1.7\">Use the same named electrical location whenever the comparison question permits it. Mark the meter, CT orientation, voltage reference, included circuits, and any parallel path on both one-line diagrams. Keep the instrument configuration, aggregation settings, and time reference with each export.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"margin:26px 0;text-align:center\"><img decoding=\"async\" style=\"max-width:640px;width:100%;height:auto;display:block;margin:0 auto;border-radius:8px\" src=\"https:\/\/cnbygele.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/14.BYFK_.webp\" alt=\"CNBYG equipment for documenting the same electrical boundary across comparison records\" \/><\/figure>\n<p style=\"margin:0 0 16px;line-height:1.7\">If a boundary or setup must change, do not hide it. State the change in the report and treat the data as a different scenario unless the project reviewer agrees on a controlled conversion. The <a href=\"https:\/\/cnbygele.com\/ar\/blog\/apf-sizing-calculation-measured-harmonic-current\/\">APF sizing evidence<\/a> guide is a separate measurement-led planning resource, not a replacement for a matched comparison.<\/p>\n<table style=\"width:100%;border-collapse:collapse\">\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th style=\"border:1px solid #d9e1e8;padding:9px 12px;background:#f5f8fa;text-align:left\">Setup item<\/th>\n<th style=\"border:1px solid #d9e1e8;padding:9px 12px;background:#f5f8fa;text-align:left\">Keep constant or disclose<\/th>\n<th style=\"border:1px solid #d9e1e8;padding:9px 12px;background:#f5f8fa;text-align:left\">\u0644\u0645\u0627\u0630\u0627 \u0647\u0630\u0627 \u0645\u0647\u0645<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #d9e1e8;padding:9px 12px\">Electrical location<\/td>\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #d9e1e8;padding:9px 12px\">Meter, CT, voltage reference, and included circuits<\/td>\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #d9e1e8;padding:9px 12px\">Defines the loads represented by the record.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #d9e1e8;padding:9px 12px\">Instrument configuration<\/td>\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #d9e1e8;padding:9px 12px\">Settings, interval, and event setup<\/td>\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #d9e1e8;padding:9px 12px\">Avoids comparing differently configured measurements.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #d9e1e8;padding:9px 12px\">Time basis<\/td>\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #d9e1e8;padding:9px 12px\">Clock reference and capture duration<\/td>\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #d9e1e8;padding:9px 12px\">Keeps the record windows traceable.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #d9e1e8;padding:9px 12px\">Connection state<\/td>\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #d9e1e8;padding:9px 12px\">Bypass, parallel path, and source arrangement<\/td>\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #d9e1e8;padding:9px 12px\">Identifies topology changes that affect comparison.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<h2 style=\"margin:42px 0 14px;scroll-margin-top:96px\" id=\"part-3-match-operating-conditions-before-comparing-records\">Part 3. Match operating conditions before comparing records<\/h2>\n<p style=\"margin:0 0 16px;line-height:1.7\">Compare like operating states, not calendar dates. Name the shift, production condition, process speed, active drive groups, rectifiers, UPS loads, HVAC loads, capacitor state, and any source or switching change. A quiet maintenance period should not be presented as a direct match for a production peak without clear disclosure.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:0 0 16px;line-height:1.7\">Use a small set of named scenarios. For each scenario, retain the same measurement boundary and configuration where possible. If a post-installation operating state has no pre-installation equivalent, record it as a separate observation rather than calculating an implied improvement.<\/p>\n<table style=\"width:100%;border-collapse:collapse\">\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th style=\"border:1px solid #d9e1e8;padding:9px 12px;background:#f5f8fa;text-align:left\">Scenario field<\/th>\n<th style=\"border:1px solid #d9e1e8;padding:9px 12px;background:#f5f8fa;text-align:left\">Pre\/post record<\/th>\n<th style=\"border:1px solid #d9e1e8;padding:9px 12px;background:#f5f8fa;text-align:left\">Avoid assuming<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #d9e1e8;padding:9px 12px\">Production state<\/td>\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #d9e1e8;padding:9px 12px\">Process, speed range, and active lines<\/td>\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #d9e1e8;padding:9px 12px\">That two days automatically have the same load.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #d9e1e8;padding:9px 12px\">Major nonlinear loads<\/td>\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #d9e1e8;padding:9px 12px\">Drive, rectifier, or UPS state<\/td>\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #d9e1e8;padding:9px 12px\">That installed nameplate data describes actual operation.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #d9e1e8;padding:9px 12px\">Switching condition<\/td>\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #d9e1e8;padding:9px 12px\">Capacitor, bypass, transfer, or maintenance state<\/td>\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #d9e1e8;padding:9px 12px\">That a transient is representative operation.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #d9e1e8;padding:9px 12px\">Source configuration<\/td>\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #d9e1e8;padding:9px 12px\">Feeder and supply-side arrangement<\/td>\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #d9e1e8;padding:9px 12px\">That topology stayed unchanged.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<h2 style=\"margin:42px 0 14px;scroll-margin-top:96px\" id=\"part-4-preserve-evidence-and-disclose-changes\">Part 4. Preserve evidence and disclose changes<\/h2>\n<p style=\"margin:0 0 16px;line-height:1.7\">Keep original data exports, instrument settings, one-line diagrams, operating logs, and installation records together. Label every graph with its boundary, date, time, scenario, and configuration. A concise change log is essential when cables, CTs, sources, load groups, protection settings, or other relevant conditions changed between periods.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:0 0 16px;line-height:1.7\">\u0627\u0644 <a href=\"https:\/\/cnbygele.com\/ar\/blog\/svg-installation-commissioning-switchboard-integrators\/\">SVG commissioning records<\/a> guide provides installation documentation context. The <a href=\"https:\/\/cnbygele.com\/ar\/blog\/power-quality-baseline-report-template-rfq\/\">power-quality baseline report<\/a> page can help organize pre-installation evidence without becoming a result claim.<\/p>\n<table style=\"width:100%;border-collapse:collapse\">\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th style=\"border:1px solid #d9e1e8;padding:9px 12px;background:#f5f8fa;text-align:left\">Change to disclose<\/th>\n<th style=\"border:1px solid #d9e1e8;padding:9px 12px;background:#f5f8fa;text-align:left\">Record in the comparison package<\/th>\n<th style=\"border:1px solid #d9e1e8;padding:9px 12px;background:#f5f8fa;text-align:left\">Review effect<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #d9e1e8;padding:9px 12px\">Measurement change<\/td>\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #d9e1e8;padding:9px 12px\">Meter, CT, voltage reference, setting, or time basis<\/td>\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #d9e1e8;padding:9px 12px\">May make records non-comparable.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #d9e1e8;padding:9px 12px\">Load change<\/td>\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #d9e1e8;padding:9px 12px\">Process, production, or coincident-load condition<\/td>\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #d9e1e8;padding:9px 12px\">May explain a different electrical profile.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #d9e1e8;padding:9px 12px\">Installation change<\/td>\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #d9e1e8;padding:9px 12px\">Connection point, cable route, cabinet, or bypass state<\/td>\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #d9e1e8;padding:9px 12px\">Defines the post-installation topology.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #d9e1e8;padding:9px 12px\">Acceptance change<\/td>\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #d9e1e8;padding:9px 12px\">Metric, responsible reviewer, or decision rule<\/td>\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #d9e1e8;padding:9px 12px\">Prevents an after-the-fact interpretation.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<h2 style=\"margin:42px 0 14px;scroll-margin-top:96px\" id=\"part-5-separate-comparison-data-from-a-performance-promise\">Part 5. Separate comparison data from a performance promise<\/h2>\n<p style=\"margin:0 0 16px;line-height:1.7\">Comparison records can support a project review, but they do not create a general performance guarantee. An AHF\/APF or SVG discussion still needs a defined objective, connection point, integration scope, protection coordination, installation conditions, and acceptance method.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:0 0 16px;line-height:1.7\">\u0627\u0644 <a href=\"https:\/\/cnbygele.com\/ar\/product\/ahf-active-harmonic-filter-harmonic-control\/\">AHF Active Harmonic Filter product context<\/a> page is a starting point when the project evidence and scope are defined. It does not guarantee an improvement percentage, a compliance verdict, or an operating result.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"margin:26px 0;text-align:center\"><img decoding=\"async\" style=\"max-width:640px;width:100%;height:auto;display:block;margin:0 auto;border-radius:8px\" src=\"https:\/\/cnbygele.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/5.BYFK_-2.webp\" alt=\"CNBYG equipment shown as product context for a controlled project comparison\" \/><\/figure>\n<h2 style=\"margin:42px 0 14px;scroll-margin-top:96px\" id=\"part-6-create-a-project-comparison-package\">Part 6. Create a project comparison package<\/h2>\n<p style=\"margin:0 0 16px;line-height:1.7\">Prepare a compact package that allows a reviewer to check whether the pre and post records are comparable. Include raw files as well as the summary chart or table.<\/p>\n<table style=\"width:100%;border-collapse:collapse\">\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th style=\"border:1px solid #d9e1e8;padding:9px 12px;background:#f5f8fa;text-align:left\">\u064a\u062c\u0628 \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0634\u062a\u0631\u064a \u0623\u0646 \u064a\u0648\u0641\u0631<\/th>\n<th style=\"border:1px solid #d9e1e8;padding:9px 12px;background:#f5f8fa;text-align:left\">\u0644\u0645\u0627\u0630\u0627 \u0647\u0630\u0627 \u0645\u0647\u0645<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #d9e1e8;padding:9px 12px\">Pre\/post one-line diagrams and nominal system details<\/td>\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #d9e1e8;padding:9px 12px\">Identifies the electrical boundary and topology in each period.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #d9e1e8;padding:9px 12px\">Meter, CT, voltage-reference, and instrument settings<\/td>\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #d9e1e8;padding:9px 12px\">Makes the acquisition setup traceable.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #d9e1e8;padding:9px 12px\">Pre\/post exports with time windows<\/td>\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #d9e1e8;padding:9px 12px\">Preserves original evidence behind any chart.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #d9e1e8;padding:9px 12px\">Named operating-state logs and load inventories<\/td>\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #d9e1e8;padding:9px 12px\">Tests whether the scenarios are comparable.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #d9e1e8;padding:9px 12px\">Installation and switching change log<\/td>\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #d9e1e8;padding:9px 12px\">Discloses differences that affect interpretation.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #d9e1e8;padding:9px 12px\">Acceptance method, reviewer, and installation constraints<\/td>\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #d9e1e8;padding:9px 12px\">Defines the project review boundary.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p style=\"margin:0 0 16px;line-height:1.7\">CNBYG can discuss product-line fit after the comparison package defines the project objective and evidence basis. Use <a href=\"https:\/\/cnbygele.com\/ar\/contact-us\/\">the comparison package<\/a> to begin that discussion; this method cannot replace a contractual acceptance process or promise an outcome.<\/p>\n<h2 style=\"margin:42px 0 14px;scroll-margin-top:96px\" id=\"frequently-asked-questions\">\u0623\u0633\u0626\u0644\u0629 \u0645\u062a\u0643\u0631\u0631\u0629<\/h2>\n<h3 style=\"margin:28px 0 12px\">What is a before-and-after APF or SVG comparison?<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin:0 0 16px;line-height:1.7\">It is a controlled review of pre and post records collected for the same electrical question. Its value depends on the documented boundary, instrument setup, operating state, and acceptance method.<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"margin:28px 0 12px\">Must the measurement boundary stay the same?<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin:0 0 16px;line-height:1.7\">Yes, whenever the comparison question permits it. If it changes, document the change and treat the records as separate scenarios unless the project reviewer defines a valid comparison method.<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"margin:28px 0 12px\">How should operating conditions be matched?<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin:0 0 16px;line-height:1.7\">Use named scenarios that record process state, load groups, speed, switching condition, and source arrangement. Compare only scenarios that are matched or clearly disclose why they differ.<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"margin:28px 0 12px\">Does one post-installation reading prove success?<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin:0 0 16px;line-height:1.7\">No. A post record needs a defined pre record, matched or disclosed conditions, and an agreed acceptance method before it supports a project conclusion.<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"margin:28px 0 12px\">What changes should be disclosed?<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin:0 0 16px;line-height:1.7\">Disclose measurement setup, electrical boundary, load state, topology, installed equipment, switching condition, time basis, and any acceptance-method change.<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"margin:28px 0 12px\">What belongs in a comparison package?<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin:0 0 16px;line-height:1.7\">Provide pre\/post diagrams, system data, measurement settings, original exports, operating logs, change log, installation constraints, and the agreed review method.<\/p>\n<h2 style=\"margin:42px 0 14px;scroll-margin-top:96px\" id=\"references\">\u0627\u0644\u0645\u0631\u0627\u062c\u0639<\/h2>\n<ul style=\"margin:0 0 18px 1.2em;line-height:1.7\">\n<li style=\"margin:0 0 8px\"><a href=\"https:\/\/standards.ieee.org\/ieee\/519\/5892\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">IEEE 519 overview for harmonic-control assessment<\/a><\/li>\n<li style=\"margin:0 0 8px\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nema.org\/standards\/view\/motors-and-generators\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">NEMA MG 1 resources for motor-system context<\/a><\/li>\n<li style=\"margin:0 0 8px\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.energy.gov\/cmei\/ito\/industrial-technologies-office\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">DOE industrial technologies reference resources<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A before-and-after APF or SVG comparison is only as useful as its comparison basis. The pre and post records should answer the same question at the same electrical boundary, using known meter settings and comparable operating conditions. Otherwise, a difference in the data may only describe a difference in the plant state. For broader planning [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":1635,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_gspb_post_css":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2366","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-blog"],"blocksy_meta":{"styles_descriptor":{"styles":{"desktop":"","tablet":"","mobile":""},"google_fonts":[],"version":7}},"acf":[],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cnbygele.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2366","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cnbygele.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cnbygele.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cnbygele.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cnbygele.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2366"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/cnbygele.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2366\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2367,"href":"https:\/\/cnbygele.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2366\/revisions\/2367"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cnbygele.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1635"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cnbygele.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2366"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cnbygele.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2366"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cnbygele.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2366"}],"curies":[{"name":"\u0644\u0639\u0628 \u062c\u064a\u062f\u0629","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}